Sorry for the many months between posts. I have spent the past two months trying to get up to speed with all of the truthful information being censored by the traditional media and the social media firms that are protected by Section 230 (hello Congress are you ever going to stop taking their money and make them act responsibly????) and abuse that free pass created for them.
If you came here looking for how to quickly recover from covid, you need to go to https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/FLCCC-Alliance-I-MASKplus-Protocol-ENGLISH.pdf this very moment. You need to get on it ASAP. The first five days is a critical period. You need to start EARLY TREATMENT. Do not follow the standard “call if it gets worse” instructions provided by 99% of the medical community. The mantra is: EARLY TREATMENT WORKS.
My go to sources regarding treatment and the whole are vaccine safe crap show, I primarily go several substack posters to get my information. Please note that several of these folks have been called “misinformation grifters” by Chelsea Clinton (is there a family that better exemplifies the word grifter as the Clintons (well the Biden’s maybe…) and are being targeted for removal from substack by the regime…..
Those posters in my preferred order are:
pierrekory@substack.com - One of the founders of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance.
jessicar@substack.com - a viral immunologist that is looking closely at the VAERS database and performing truthful statistical analysis without cherry picking data to fit a narrative.
stevekirsch@substack.com - a Silicon Valley entrepreneur and philanthropist who founded the COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund (CETF) at the beginning of the pandemic. Steve and CETF funded the research that showed promising results of fluvoxamine as an early treatment of COVID-19. Steve also founded the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation, which is researching the safety of the COVID-19 vaccines.
eugyppius@substack.com - A rather mysterious poster who I am assuming is on the European continent. He/She is very intelligent and their posts always reference actual government provided data from across Europe.
alexberenson@substack.com - a former New York Times reporter and the author of 13 novels, three non-fiction books, and the Unreported Truths booklets. His newest book, PANDEMIA, on the coronavirus and our response to it was released in Nov 2021.
It is not necessary for Congress to do anything to end the Section 230 protections for social media providers. Those protections expired long ago and are no longer in force. The protections from liability afforded by 230 apply to sites or services that are acting as common carriers, like an email provider or your cellular provider (both in terms of SMS texts and phone calls). A common carrier does not pick and choose which communications are carried by content. They all go through.
Section 230 does not apply to publications. An internet site or service that curates or edits its content is a publication. This makes it essentially the same as a publication like the New York Times. Anything written on the pages of the NYT confers liability for that statement on the NYT.
When the social media began censoring views they don't like, they stopped being common carriers and became publications. There is nothing stopping lawsuits from proceeding other than the mistaken belief that lawsuits are impossible. Let them fly!
This, in fact, is a good thing, if we ever want to get back to a world in which people who have "unacceptable" viewpoints, in the words of the Canadian fuehrer, are able to communicate them just as easily as anyone else, 230 provides them a strong incentive to do so. Stop curating, editing, censoring, and "fact" checking people's content, or be liable for every video, every post, every tweet, every image that every person worldwide posts on your service.